The Evolution of American Family StructurePosted June 23, 2015 | By Tricia Hussung
Mainstream culture in America is constantly evolving to reflect the predominant values and belief systems of the day, including what are often considered immutable social systems, such as the family. Instead of being one unit, the institution has been in a constant state of evolution since the founding of America itself.
Today, there really is no consistent definition of the American family. With single-parent households, varying family structures and fewer children, the modern family defies categorization. But these most recent changes have brought with them a nostalgia-based myth: that “divorce, domestic violence and single parenthood are recent phenomena (and) that, throughout most of American history, most families consisted of a breadwinner husband and a homemaker wife.” When the history of the American family is surveyed in-depth, it becomes apparent that this is not the case. Constant change and adaptation are the only themes that remain consistent for families throughout America’s history. In fact, “recent changes in family life are only the latest in a series of disjunctive transformations in family roles, functions and dynamics that have occurred over the (centuries).”
A Brief History of the Pre-20th Century Family
When America was founded, a family consisted of a husband, wife, biological children and extended family — except for in the case of slaves. This meant that most people who could legally marry did, and then stayed married until death. Divorce was rare. Because this structure was so dominant, it played “a crucial role in the creation and replication of cultural roles for men and women.” The role of wives was to assist their husbands within the home, both keeping house and raising children.
Wives had no legal identity under a condition called coverture, in which married women “could not own property, could not enter into contracts and could neither sue nor be sued in their own names.” Husbands, in contrast, were managers and providers in the family. They controlled finances and had ultimate authority in the eyes of both society and the law. This meant that a husband had “a duty to provide his wife (and children) with the necessities of life.”
It was generally against the law to live together or have children outside of marriage. However, by the 19th century these rigid legal boundaries were relaxed, with common-law marriage widely recognized as an acceptable union.
Government and the Family
The 19th century brought about a number of important changes to the family. In the first half of the century, married women began to have property rights through the Married Women’s Property Acts, which began to be enacted in 1839. By the early 20th century, most states permitted married women to “own property, sue and be sued, enter into contracts and control the disposition of property upon her death.” However, during this time a woman’s role in the family was still defined by her husband.
Another important development was government regulation of some aspects of childhood, such as child labor and schooling. To improve the well-being of children, “reformers pressed for compulsory school attendance laws, child labor restrictions, playgrounds … and widow’s pensions to permit poor children to remain with their mothers.”
Despite these legal changes, the family became an even more important source of happiness and satisfaction. The “companionate family was envisioned as a more isolated, and more important unit — the primary focus of emotional life.” New ideas about marriage emerged, based on choice, companionship and romantic love. This in turn caused a surge in the divorce rate, which tripled between 1860 and 1910.
Depression and War
The stability of families was tested by the Great Depression, as unemployment and lower wages forced Americans to delay marriage and having children. The divorce rate fell during this time because it was expensive and few could afford it. However, by 1940 almost 2 million married couples lived apart. Some families adjusted to the economic downturn by “returning to a cooperative family economy. Many children took part-time jobs and many wives supplemented the family income.”
When the Depression ended and World War II began, families coped with new issues: a shortage of housing, lack of schools and prolonged separation. Women ran households and raised children alone, and some went to work in war industries. The results of the war-stricken state of society were that “thousands of young people became latchkey children and rates of juvenile delinquency, unwed pregnancy and truancy all rose.”
Family Structures in the Postwar World
In reaction to the tumult both at home and abroad during the 1940s, the 1950s marked a swift shift to a new type of domesticity. The average age for women to marry was 20, divorce rates stabilized and the birthrate doubled. However, the perfect images of family life that appeared on television don’t tell the whole story: “Only 60 percent of children spent their childhood in a male-breadwinner, female-homemaker household.”
This “democratization of family ideals” reflected a singular society and economy, one that was driven by a reaction against Depression and war and compounded by rising incomes and low prices. The economic boom that followed World War II led to significant economic growth, particularly in manufacturing and consumer goods; around 13 million new homes were built in the 1950s.
Families moved to the suburbs because they could afford to, and the family became a “haven in a heartless world,” as well as “an alternative world of satisfaction and intimacy” for adults and children that had experienced the ravages of wartime. In fact, this is where the concept of close-knit families as we know it originates. Domestic containment as a way of life was reinforced by American youth, who wanted to have long-lasting and stronger relationships than their parents had. Soldiers and servicemen who returned from war were looking to get married and raise children.
The Idyllic ’50s
The standard structure of the family in postwar America consisted of a “breadwinner male, his wife who did household chores and looked after the children, and the children.” Families ate meals and went on outings together, and lived in sociable neighborhoods. Parents paid close attention to disciplining their children and live-in relationships were unheard of — in fact, girls stayed in their parents’ home until marriage and did not commonly attend college. Children became emotional rather than economic assets for the first time, close with their parents and the center of the family. Because of this, parents studied child development and worked to socialize their children so that they would become successful adults. Childhood became a distinct period of life. However, young girls were “not considered to be fit for the attainment of higher education, as they were looked upon as housewives.”
All in all, family structure in the ’50s was based around one central necessity: a secure life. The economic and global instability of the early 20th century gave rise to the need for closely defined family units. This led to an ideology that lauded economic advancement and social order, the results of which were younger marriages that lasted longer, more children, fewer divorces and the nuclear family.
The Modern Family Unit
The nuclear family of the ’50s epitomized the economically stable family unit. The idea of the middle-class, child-centered families that were “headed by wage-earning husbands became the ideal, although making that family model the norm for most Americans took decades and (even) then was short-lived.” This is why the modern family, in most cases, bears little resemblance to this “ideal” unit.
Many of the changes that were part of this transition are a direct result of the expanding role of women in society, both in terms of the workplace and education. The rise of the post-industrial economy, based in information and services, led to more married women entering the workplace. As early as 1960, around a third of middle class women were working either part- or full-time jobs. Since the ’60s, families have also become “smaller, less stable and more diverse.” More adults, whether young or elderly, live outside of the family as well. Today, the male-breadwinner, female-housewife family represents only a small percentage of American households. A considerable majority of Americans (62 percent) view the idea of marriage as “one in which husband and wife both work and share child care and household duties.” Two-earner families are much more common as well. In 2008, the U.S. Department of Labor reported that women made up almost 50 percent of the paid labor force, putting them on equal footing with men when it comes to working outside the home. In addition, single-parent families headed by mothers, families formed through remarriage, and empty-nest families have all become part of the norm.
Along with these shifts have come declining marriage and birthrates and a rising divorce rate. The American birthrate is half of what it was in 1960, and hit its lowest point ever in 2012. In addition, the number of cohabitating couples increased from less than half a million in 1960 to 4.9 million in the 2000 census. According to the 2005 American Community Survey, more than 50 percent of households in America were headed by an unmarried person during that year. And by 2007, almost 40 percent of children were born to unmarried, adult mothers. One reason for these developments is that marriage has been repositioned as a “cornerstone to capstone, from a foundational act of early adulthood to a crowning event of later adulthood.” It is viewed as an event that should happen after finishing college and establishing a career.
Further Change in the Marital Family
A number of historical factors contributed to shifts in how Americans perceive and participate in family structure. According to the American Bar Association, in 1965, the Supreme Court extended constitutional protections for “various forms of reproductive freedom” through its ruling in Griswold v. Connecticut. There were also medical advances in contraception, including the invention of the birth control pill in 1960. As a result, the way children were brought into families became more varied than ever before. Divorce changed during the ’60s as well. In 1969, California became “the first state to adopt no-fault divorce, permitting parties to end their marriage simply upon showing irreconcilable differences.” And within 16 years, every other state had followed suit.
Included in these trends is the expansion of rights granted to same-sex couples. With the decline of barriers to lesbian and gay unions and the increase in legal protections, “the number of lesbian and gay people living openly and forming families has expanded.” However, for most legal purposes these relationships are not treated like marriages in common law. Still, in general families are more racially, ethnically, religiously and stylistically diverse “than half a generation ago — than even half a year ago.”
However, all of this change does not mean that the family is a dying institution. About 90 percent of Americans still marry and have children, and those who divorce usually remarry. Though marriages today “look different, are formed at different times, and are dissolved differently and at different times than they were in the past, at least in the near future it appears that marriage will remain a prominent family structure and cultural force.”
The Role of Family Science
Many who are interested in family development and culture choose to pursue a career in family science. With an emphasis on current issues and skills for living successfully in today’s society, this applied science is constantly evolving, much like the family units that are its area of study. It is a discipline in which “the primary goals are the discovery, verification and application of knowledge about the family.” It includes contributions from related academic areas such as law, sociology, psychology, anthropology, healthcare and more. Because of this, professionals in the field practice in a variety of contexts, including:
- Community outreach
- Human services
The field of family science plays an important role in navigating the implications of today’s global society. Though the families of today have little in common with those in previous decades and centuries, family science professionals have a clear perspective on how to approach the complexities of a constantly evolving institution. And these skills will only become more valuable as families continue to evolve. As TheNew York Times puts it, “In America, family is at once about home and the next great frontier.”
Next Steps: Family Science Degrees at Concordia University, St. Paul
Concordia University, St. Paul offers online family science degree programs at both the undergraduate and graduate level. The comprehensive education students receive through these programs allows them to become practitioners in this dynamic and interdisciplinary field. Because both of Concordia’s family science programs are approved by the National Council on Family Relations (NCFR), students are also prepared for a wide variety of careers after graduation. To learn more about these online degree programs, visit the online campus.
What image do the words “close-knit family” bring up in your mind?
Do you see a family which is defined by a strong bond that ties all the members together? One where everybody is generally happy. The parents seem to very much love and respect each other as well as their kids. The kids are well-adjusted and know their place — both in the family and in the world in general. They support and encourage each other through good and bad times alike. They all know that they will always have a place to go back to, no matter where life takes them.
How can we make sure our family is that family? How can we lay the foundations for something that withstands the test of time and life’s little curve balls?
Let’s explore that this month.
This page will be a placeholder for all the articles related to this topic as we go through the month. I will publish the first article today along with this page, and then update this page every Monday as a new article is published. For any reason, if you can’t read the articles just yet, you may want to bookmark this page so you can come back to it later. The most effective way to ensure that you don’t miss any articles is of course to sign up for the free weekly email notifications.
Ok, here we go –